Legal framework and considerations for shareholder disputes
In this article, we will look at how you can try to mediate shareholder disputes and the legal remedies available to shareholders.
Unfortunately, shareholder disputes are extremely common and can arise out of differences in the perceived value of a company, violations of rights, misrepresentation of facts and figures, and conflicts of interest. Ideally, you should try to resolve shareholder disputes through internal dispute-resolution mechanisms recommended and outlined in the agreement and company by-laws.
However, mediation and negotiations may not always effectively resolve shareholder disputes and you may need to find remedies . When you do so, it is important to understand the legal framework and considerations surrounding shareholder disputes.
Knowledge of the relevant laws and arbitration processes is also important for business owners to manage shareholder disputes and ensure stable corporate governance. Hence, in this article, we will look at how you can try to mediate shareholder disputes and the legal remedies available to shareholders.
Role of shareholders’ agreement in addressing disputes?
Legal proceedings should be your last resort for resolving shareholder disputes since they can be time-consuming, costly, and strain relationships. Another drawback of legal proceedings is that the solution enforced by the court may not always be in line with what either party wanted but it would be a solution that all parties must abide by or make a formal appeal against at a higher court.
Furthermore, a lot of valuable information that the company would prefer to keep confidential could become widely known as a result of legal proceedings.
Hence, you must first try to resolve shareholder disputes through negotiations and mediation. This approach is also known as alternative dispute resolution (ADR) approach. Typically, these agreements will include the following important clauses that can be helpful in shareholder dispute resolution:
Restrictions on certain corporate actions
The shareholders’ agreement may place some restrictions on how a company can operate and the kind of decisions that can be taken by the management. In this clause, the shareholders’ agreement typically restricts actions outside a company’s ordinary course of business.
This clause will stipulate the type of decision that will require board approval. Such decisions could be about large financial commitments, amendments to governance policy, and appointment of key executives.
Restrictions on the transfer of shares
A shareholders’ agreement will specify which kind of shares can be transferred and which are non-transferable. For instance, if a multi-class share system is followed at a company, the agreement may state that class A is not transferrable, class B is transferable. The sale of shares held by certain shareholders must be given priority in a liquidity event like an IPO or an acquisition.
Rights of last look and first refusal (ROLL and ROFR)
If a shareholder wishes to sell shares and others have the right of last look, the shareholder must offer the same terms to other fellow shareholders. This allows the existing group of shareholders to retain their control over the company.
The right to first refusal is an anti-dilution right. If they have the right of first refusal, when a company issues new, it must first offer them the right, and only after their refusal can they offer it to a third party.
Tag-along and drag-along rights
Tag-along rights allow a minority to join a majority shareholder’s share sale to a third party. This provides minorities with a higher degree of liquidity.
Drag-along rights give a majority to compel a minority to sell their shares in a company sale. This ensures that minorities cannot unfairly roadblock share sales.
Clauses on deadlock resolution and arbitration
The clauses on deadlock resolution and arbitration outline how disagreements between shareholders and directors should be handled. These clauses will specify timelines for negotiations, designated mediators or arbitrators, venues for discussions, and other important components of the dispute resolution procedures.
Typically, deadlock resolution clauses will focus on managing internal disputes while arbitration clauses address broader disputes.
Often, the clauses on mediation and arbitration require shareholders to give up their right to a jury trial. However, these restrictions may not apply if a judge considers the arbitration inappropriate, inadequate, or unenforceable.
So, if you wish to seek remedy from trials, you must first be able to make the case that the arbitration actually performed fell short of what was specified in the shareholders’ agreement. This is only possible if you understand the arbitration clauses.
Dissolution procedures
The dissolution procedure clause comes into effect when a company is being liquidated and the claims of all stakeholders are being settled. These clauses specify which stakeholders’ claims will be given priority in such events. These clauses also specify how disagreements on final payouts should be handled by designated mediators and arbitrators.
Laws governing shareholder disputes
A complex framework of laws and regulations are governed by disputes, primarily encapsulated in the Companies Act 2006. These laws outline the rights and remedies available, particularly in conflicts between the minority and majority of them or between shareholders and directors.
Some of the important laws that govern shareholder disputes are as follows:
Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL)
Most US companies are incorporated in Delaware because of the state’s business-friendly laws, and tax systems. More than 66% of Fortune 500 companies were incorporated in Delaware According to the PGC Group.This makes it extremely important for investors to understand Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) which governs a Delaware corporation’s affairs from formation to mergers, consolidations, conversions, and dissolutions. This law also outlines the procedures for handling lawsuits involving corporations, directors, officers, and stockholders.
The subchapters of DGCL also define the powers of various parties such as directors and officers, and the fiduciary responsibilities of the same. Here, you can find important clarifications on how foreign corporations, public benefit corporations, and close corporations should be structured and governed.
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
Secondary market transactions in the United States governed the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and it resulted in the creation of the SEC. This act lays down the requirements for financial disclosures, audits, and the registration of securities listed on stock exchanges.
Most of the provisions of this act typically only apply to publicly traded securities, however, its anti-fraud provisions apply to all securities.
For instance, Rule 10b5 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 outlaws insider trading and enforces cooling-off periods before and after important disclosures during which directors, officers, and principal stockholders cannot trade their company’s securities.
Other state corporate and contract laws
Most US companies are incorporated in the state of Delaware; however, your corporation could be incorporated elsewhere. In such cases, you must familiarize yourself with the relevant state laws governing corporations and contracts.
You must study how these laws define the responsibilities of directors and officers and the disclosure requirements for corporations.
In addition to explicitly recommending dispute resolution mechanisms, these laws will also define the extent of shareholder rights such as the ability to call meetings, and the right to inspect company records. Some states may provide guidelines for board composition and impose restrictions or offer support for specific types of buy-sell transactions.
Eqvista – Precise valuations for complex legal matters
In the United States, the shareholders’ agreement is instrumental in the resolution of disputes. It forms a guideline on how disagreements between shareholders, directors, and officers can be resolved through an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) approach which does not involve litigation. Through its clauses on deadlock resolution and arbitration, this agreement directly recommends ways to resolve conflicts and sometimes limits the ability of the parties to pursue lawsuits.
Typically, these agreements will place certain restrictions on corporate actions and the transfer of shares. They may also impact share sales through clauses on the right of last look (ROLL), right of first refusal (ROFR), and tag-along and drag-along rights.
In addition to the shareholders’ agreement, you must also study the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) or the law of the state where your company is incorporated. The antifraud provisions of the SEC Act of 1934 can also be relevant in handling shareholder disputes.
Are you in the middle of a shareholder dispute right now? In these disputes, it is common for the company’s fair value to come under question. If that is the case, you can rely on Eqvista’s accurate and detailed valuation reports to bring all parties on the same page regarding your company’s value. Contact us to know more!
Interested in issuing & managing shares?
If you want to start issuing and managing shares, Try out our Eqvista App, it is free and all online!